Am Dienstag, dem 15.04.2025 um 14:50 +0200 schrieb Michael Matz:
> Hello,
...
> > struct A {
> > int *buf __counted_by(len); // 'len' *must* be in the struct.
> > int len;
> > };
>
> ... means that we would have to implement general delayed parsing for
> expressions in C parsers.
I have to agree with Michael. This was the main reason
we rejected the original approach.
I also think consistency with general syntax for arrays in structs
is far more important for C than consistency for the special case of
having only one identifier in counted_by.
Martin
