> On Apr 14, 2025, at 16:35, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:28:55PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR is a C FE operator that will be removed by c_fully_fold.
>> In c_fully_fold, it assumes that operands of function calls have already
>> been folded. However, when we build call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE, all its
>> operands are not fully folded. therefore the C FE specific operator is
>> passed to middle-end.
>> 
>> In order to fix this issue, fully fold the parameters before building the
>> call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE.
>> 
>> I am doing the bootstrap and regression testing on both X86 and aarch64 now.
>> Okay for trunk if testing going well?
>> 
>> thanks.
>> 
>> Qing
>> 
>> PR c/119717
>> 
>> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
>> 
>> * c-typeck.cc (build_access_with_size_for_counted_by): Fully fold the
>> parameters for call to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE.
>> 
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 
>> * gcc.dg/pr119717.c: New test.
>> ---
>> gcc/c/c-typeck.cc               |  8 ++++++--
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119717.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119717.c
>> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>> index 3870e8a1558..dd176d96a41 100644
>> --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>> @@ -3013,12 +3013,16 @@ build_access_with_size_for_counted_by (location_t 
>> loc, tree ref,
>>   gcc_assert (c_flexible_array_member_type_p (TREE_TYPE (ref)));
>>   /* The result type of the call is a pointer to the flexible array type.  */
>>   tree result_type = c_build_pointer_type (TREE_TYPE (ref));
>> +  tree first_param
>> +    = c_fully_fold (array_to_pointer_conversion (loc, ref), FALSE, NULL);
>> +  tree second_param
>> +    = c_fully_fold (counted_by_ref, FALSE, NULL);
> 
> Why FALSE?  Just use false.  You can also use nullptr rather than NULL now.

Just replaced FALSE with false.
I am keeping NULL to be consistent with other calls to c_fully_fold in the same 
file.

And  testing the new version now.

Thanks a lot.

(With FALSE, the compilation went fine…)

Qing
> 
>>   tree call
>>     = build_call_expr_internal_loc (loc, IFN_ACCESS_WITH_SIZE,
>>     result_type, 6,
>> -     array_to_pointer_conversion (loc, ref),
>> -     counted_by_ref,
>> +     first_param,
>> +     second_param,
>>     build_int_cst (integer_type_node, 1),
>>     build_int_cst (counted_by_type, 0),
>>     build_int_cst (integer_type_node, -1),
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119717.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119717.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..e5eedc567b3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119717.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* PR c/119717  */
>> +/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c23" } */
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +
>> +struct annotated {
>> +  unsigned count;
>> +  [[gnu::counted_by(count)]] char array[];
>> +};
>> +
>> +[[gnu::noinline,gnu::noipa]]
>> +static unsigned
>> +size_of (bool x, struct annotated *a)
>> +{
>> +  char *p = (x ? a : 0)->array;
>> +  return __builtin_dynamic_object_size (p, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int main()
>> +{
>> +  struct annotated *p = __builtin_malloc(sizeof *p);
>> +  p->count = 0;
>> +  __builtin_printf ("the bdos whole is %ld\n", size_of (0, p));
>> +  return 0;
>> +}
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
>> 
> 
> Marek


Reply via email to