gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c expects and tolerates errors about dfp
builtins when dfp is not supported, but the C front end no longer
accepts calls of undeclared functions by default, even with -w.
Adding -fpermissive would do, but I thought it would be too broad, so
I went for -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration.

Regstrapped on powerpc64le-linux-gnu.  Also tested with gcc-14 on
x86_64-linux-x-powerpc-elf.  Ok to install?


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c: Allow implicit function decls.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c
index d9500dbfdb71e..0eb3c654d2d39 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-w -O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
+/* { dg-options "-w -O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 
-Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration" } */
 
 /* PR92661: The following tests should not ICE, regardless of
    whether the target supports DFP or not.  */

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/
Free Software Activist     FSFLA co-founder     GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity.
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!

Reply via email to