On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 10:32:57AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > In r10-4803-g8489e1f45b50600c I'd used POINTER_DIFF_EXPR to subtract > the two pointers involved in an overlap test. I'm not sure whether > I'd specifically chosen that over MINUS_EXPR or not; if so, the only > reason I can think of is that it is probably faster on targets with > PSImode pointers. Regardless, as the PR points out, subtracting > unrelated pointers using POINTER_DIFF_EXPR is undefined behaviour. > > Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu & x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for trunk, and > for backports after a grace period? > > Richard > > > gcc/ > PR tree-optimization/119399 > * tree-data-ref.cc (create_waw_or_war_checks): Use a MINUS_EXPR > on two converted pointers, rather than converting a POINTER_DIFF_EXPR > on the pointers. > > gcc/testsuite/ > PR tree-optimization/119399 > * gcc.dg/vect/pr119399.c: New test.
LGTM. Jakub