On 10/04/2025 14:55, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> All arm effective-targets using check_runtime use the "_hw" or
> "_multilib" suffix, so rename arm_v8_1_lob_ok into arm_v8_1_lob_hw for
> consistency.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
>       * lib/target-supports.exp: Rename arm_v8_1_lob_ok into
>       arm_v8_1_lob_hw.
>       * gcc.target/arm/lob1.c: Likewise.
>       * gcc.target/arm/lob6.c: Likewise.

Since you're changing that, would you mind making the name arm_v8_1m_lob_hw?  
Although LOB is specific to
Armv8.1-m, it's not very obvious if you're not familiar with the many 
architecture extensions.

OK with that change.

R.

> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c   | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c   | 2 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
> index c8ce653a5c3..b97dafa3512 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
>     for some simple loops.  */
>  /* { dg-do run } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_ok } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_hw } */
>  /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
> "-mcpu=*" } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
> index 4fe116e2c2b..cef9d93ee4d 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
>     with some less trivial loops and the result is correct.  */
>  /* { dg-do run } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_ok } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_hw } */
>  /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" 
> "-mcpu=*" } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
>  #include <stdlib.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp 
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> index bc4361d6092..d8e28db45de 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -13562,7 +13562,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_3a_bkey_directive 
> { } {
>  # Return 1 if the target supports executing the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low
>  # Overhead Loop, 0 otherwise.  The test is valid for ARM.
>  
> -proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok { } {
> +proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_hw { } {
>      if { ![check_effective_target_arm_cortex_m] } {
>       return 0;
>      } else {
> @@ -13588,7 +13588,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok { } {
>  
>  proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb2_no_arm_v8_1_lob { } {
>      if { [check_effective_target_arm_thumb2]
> -      && ![check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok] } {
> +      && ![check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_hw] } {
>       return 1
>      }
>      return 0
> @@ -13600,7 +13600,7 @@ proc 
> check_effective_target_arm_thumb2_no_arm_v8_1_lob { } {
>  
>  proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb2_ok_no_arm_v8_1_lob { } {
>      if { [check_effective_target_arm_thumb2_ok]
> -      && ![check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok] } {
> +      && ![check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_hw] } {
>       return 1
>      }
>      return 0

Reply via email to