Hi!

r12-2601 has added this define_insn_and_split and corresponding
(define_insn ""
  [(set (reg:CCZ CC_REG)
        (eq (zero_extract:HSI (match_operand:HSI 0 "register_operand" "r")
                              (const_int 1)
                              (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand" "n"))
            (const_int 0)))]
  "INTVAL (operands[1]) < 16"
  "btst %Z1,%Y0"
  [(set_attr "length" "2")])
pattern into which the define_insn_and_split wants to splut in addition
to a conditional jump.
But as can be seen, the btst define_insn uses HSI mode iterator while
define_insn_and_split QHSI, so for QImode it splits into something that
can't be recognized.

This was probably latent since r12-2601 and on the attached testcase
is reproduceable starting with r15-1945 - a late combiner change.

Untested except for the testcase with x86_64-linux -> h8300-elf cross.

Ok for trunk?

2025-04-09  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/119664
        * config/h8300/jumpcall.md (bit test and jump define_insn_and_split):
        Use HSI iterator rather than QHSI.

        * gcc.dg/pr119664.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/h8300/jumpcall.md.jj     2021-08-30 08:36:11.044519071 +0200
+++ gcc/config/h8300/jumpcall.md        2025-04-08 13:11:03.643093722 +0200
@@ -146,9 +146,9 @@
 (define_insn_and_split ""
   [(set (pc)
        (if_then_else (match_operator 3 "eqne_operator"
-                       [(zero_extract:QHSI (match_operand:QHSI 1 
"register_operand" "r")
-                                           (const_int 1)
-                                           (match_operand 2 
"const_int_operand" "n"))
+                       [(zero_extract:HSI (match_operand:HSI 1 
"register_operand" "r")
+                                          (const_int 1)
+                                          (match_operand 2 "const_int_operand" 
"n"))
                         (const_int 0)])
                      (label_ref (match_operand 0 "" ""))
                      (pc)))]
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
   "#"
   "&& reload_completed"
   [(set (reg:CCZ CC_REG)
-       (eq (zero_extract:QHSI (match_dup 1) (const_int 1) (match_dup 2))
+       (eq (zero_extract:HSI (match_dup 1) (const_int 1) (match_dup 2))
            (const_int 0)))
    (set (pc)
        (if_then_else (match_op_dup 3 [(reg:CCZ CC_REG) (const_int 0)])
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119664.c.jj  2024-09-17 09:04:10.523093614 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr119664.c     2025-04-09 21:19:29.753086945 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR target/119664 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os" } */
+
+struct S { unsigned : 1, a : 1; } *s;
+int foo (void);
+void bar (void);
+
+int
+baz (void)
+{
+  int a = s->a;
+  bar ();
+  return a && foo ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to