Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> writes: > Since r15-7878-ge1c49f413c8, these tests appear as XPASS on aarch64, > so we can remove the xfails introduced by r12-102-gf31ddad8ac8f11. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c: Remove xfail for aarch64. > * gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c: Likewise.
OK, thanks. Richard > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c | 4 ++-- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c > index 2fd884209f2..12949282516 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int main() > debug stmt for the final value of the loop during loop distribution > which would fix the UNSUPPORTED cases. > c is optimized out at -Og for no obvious reason. */ > - optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "i + 1" "8" { xfail { > aarch64*-*-* && { any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */ > - /* { dg-final { gdb-test .-1 "c + 1" "2" { xfail { aarch64*-*-* && { > any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */ > + optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "i + 1" "8" } } */ > + /* { dg-final { gdb-test .-1 "c + 1" "2" } } */ > return 0; > } > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c > index fe7e5567625..b2f5c9d146e 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c > @@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ int main() > Instead test j + 1 which will make the test UNSUPPORTED if i > is optimized out. Since the test previously had wrong debug > with j == 0 this is acceptable. */ > - optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "j + 1" "9" { xfail { > aarch64*-*-* && { any-opts "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } } } } } */ > + optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "j + 1" "9" } } */ > return 0; > }