My validator flagged this. Modern HTML avoid physical markup like <tt>, 
and <code> is a good fit here.

Pushed.

Gerald

---
 htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html 
b/htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html
index 6ff9497c..e794734c 100644
--- a/htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html
+++ b/htdocs/projects/cxx-dr-status.html
@@ -20209,7 +20209,7 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2882";>2882</a></td>
       <td>DRWP</td>
-      <td>Unclear treatment of conversion to <tt>void</tt></td>
+      <td>Unclear treatment of conversion to <code>void</code></td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20286,7 +20286,7 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2893";>2893</a></td>
       <td>NAD</td>
-      <td>Instantiations in discarded <tt>if constexpr</tt> substatements</td>
+      <td>Instantiations in discarded <code>if constexpr</code> 
substatements</td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20321,7 +20321,7 @@
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2898";>2898</a></td>
       <td>open</td>
-      <td>Clarify implicit conversion sequence from <i>cv</i> <tt>T</tt> to 
<tt>T</tt></td>
+      <td>Clarify implicit conversion sequence from <i>cv</i> <code>T</code> 
to <code>T</code></td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20349,14 +20349,14 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2902";>2902</a></td>
       <td>review</td>
-      <td>Implicit <tt>this</tt> transformation outside of permitted 
contexts</td>
+      <td>Implicit <code>this</code> transformation outside of permitted 
contexts</td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2903";>2903</a></td>
       <td>drafting</td>
-      <td>Can we omit the <tt>template</tt> disambiguator in 
<i>nested-name-specifier</i>s in type-only contexts?</td>
+      <td>Can we omit the <code>template</code> disambiguator in 
<i>nested-name-specifier</i>s in type-only contexts?</td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20384,14 +20384,14 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2907";>2907</a></td>
       <td>DR</td>
-      <td>Constant lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on uninitialized 
<tt>std::nullptr_t</tt></td>
+      <td>Constant lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on uninitialized 
<code>std::nullptr_t</code></td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2908";>2908</a></td>
       <td>DR</td>
-      <td>Counting physical source lines for <tt>__LINE__</tt></td>
+      <td>Counting physical source lines for <code>__LINE__</code></td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20440,14 +20440,14 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2915";>2915</a></td>
       <td>DR</td>
-      <td>Explicit object parameters of type <tt>void</tt></td>
+      <td>Explicit object parameters of type <code>void</code></td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2916";>2916</a></td>
       <td>review</td>
-      <td>Variable template partial specializations should not be declared 
<tt>static</tt></td>
+      <td>Variable template partial specializations should not be declared 
<code>static</code></td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20475,7 +20475,7 @@
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2920";>2920</a></td>
       <td>open</td>
-      <td>The <tt>template</tt> keyword for base classes</td>
+      <td>The <code>template</code> keyword for base classes</td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20524,7 +20524,7 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2927";>2927</a></td>
       <td>DR</td>
-      <td>Unclear status of translation unit with <tt>module</tt> keyword</td>
+      <td>Unclear status of translation unit with <code>module</code> 
keyword</td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20573,7 +20573,7 @@
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2934";>2934</a></td>
       <td>open</td>
-      <td>Unclear semantics of exception escaping from 
<tt>unhandled_exception</tt></td>
+      <td>Unclear semantics of exception escaping from 
<code>unhandled_exception</code></td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20608,7 +20608,7 @@
     <tr>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2939";>2939</a></td>
       <td>DR</td>
-      <td>Do not allow <tt>reinterpret_cast</tt> from prvalue to rvalue 
reference</td>
+      <td>Do not allow <code>reinterpret_cast</code> from prvalue to rvalue 
reference</td>
       <td class="unsupported">?</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20797,7 +20797,7 @@
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2966";>2966</a></td>
       <td>open</td>
-      <td>Alignment and value representation of <tt>std::nullptr_t</tt></td>
+      <td>Alignment and value representation of 
<code>std::nullptr_t</code></td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
@@ -20825,7 +20825,7 @@
     <tr class="open">
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/cwg2970";>2970</a></td>
       <td>open</td>
-      <td>Races with <tt>volatile sig_atomic_t</tt> bit-fields</td>
+      <td>Races with <code>volatile sig_atomic_t</code> bit-fields</td>
       <td>-</td>
       <td></td>
     </tr>
-- 
2.48.1

Reply via email to