And as an addendum: Special thanks to Richard Biener and Jakub Jelinek for all their work on this, and to the community in general for the generous advice and support.
I can honestly say I have never worked in this kind of paradigm, and it's been a remarkable experince, and really kind of fun. (I note that I once jumped out of an airplane. After all the training and drill, the jumpmaster said, "Look: We train and train for something to go wrong. Nothing ever goes wrong. And we train you to go into an arched falling position. You won't do that; nobody does on their first jump. What's going to happen is you are going to go out the door and into the slipstream, and there will be a second of complete confusion and disorientation until the static line starts to pull your 'chute out of the pack. "That second is what you paid your money for. Enjoy it." "Fun" can have many meanings.) > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Dubner <rdub...@symas.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 16:12 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [committed] cobol: Changes to eliminate _Float128 from the front > end > > I am putting up this e-mail for the record. I asked myself if it was > "okay for trunk?", and myself answered "If it's not, I quit!" > > When merged into the cobolworx test environment, all of our tests pass. > > When merged into master, the results compile, and check-cobol, such as > it is, succeeds. > > I just pushed it into master.
