On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:55:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If it was HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX + (size_t) 1 to ~(size_t) 0, previously it would > be false and now is false.
Sorry, this case used to be false and now is true. Jakub
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:55:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If it was HOST_WIDE_INT_MAX + (size_t) 1 to ~(size_t) 0, previously it would > be false and now is false.
Sorry, this case used to be false and now is true. Jakub