Hi!

The following testcase ICEs, because the splitters into vptest
create an invalid instruction.  The operands of all the UNSPEC_PTEST
using instructions use register_operand and vector_operand predicate,
these splitters use vector_operand predicate but create vptest
instruction which has the same argument twice, so one of them needs
to be in a register.
The following patch keeps vector_operand predicate on the splitters
but uses force_reg to force it into a REG if it was a MEM, that results
in better code generation e.g. on the included testcase, as combine
can match those even with MEM.
The difference on the testcase is
-       vpxor   %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
-       vpcmpeqb        (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
-       vpmovmskb       %xmm0, %eax
-       cmpl    $65535, %eax
+       vmovdqa (%rdi), %xmm0
+       vptest  %xmm0, %xmm0
(- for patch which changes the splitters to
s/vector_operand/register_operand/ and + for this patch).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2025-03-19  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/119357
        * config/i386/sse.md (pmovmskb 0xffff to ptest splitter,
        *pmovsk_ptest_<mode>_avx512): Force operands[0] into a REG.

        * gcc.target/i386/avx512vlbw-pr119357.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj   2025-02-08 08:54:24.070260101 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md      2025-03-18 19:58:46.603529373 +0100
@@ -22414,7 +22414,8 @@ (define_split
   [(set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG)
        (unspec:CCZ [(match_dup 0)
                     (match_dup 0)]
-                   UNSPEC_PTEST))])
+                   UNSPEC_PTEST))]
+  "operands[0] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[0]);")
 
 (define_insn_and_split "*pmovsk_mask_cmp_<mode>_avx512"
   [(set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG)
@@ -22455,7 +22456,8 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*pmovsk_ptest_<m
   [(set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG)
        (unspec:CCZ [(match_dup 0)
                     (match_dup 0)]
-                   UNSPEC_PTEST))])
+                   UNSPEC_PTEST))]
+  "operands[0] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[0]);")
 
 (define_expand "sse2_maskmovdqu"
   [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "memory_operand")
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512vlbw-pr119357.c.jj      2025-03-18 
20:10:42.671608261 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512vlbw-pr119357.c 2025-03-18 
20:09:58.289222946 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* PR target/119357 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx512bw -mavx512vl" } */
+
+#include <x86intrin.h>
+
+typedef char V __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
+
+void
+foo (V *p)
+{
+  if (_mm_movemask_epi8 ((__m128i) (*p == 0)) != 65535)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to