* Patrick Palka <ppa...@redhat.com> [2025-03-05 11:15:06]:

> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2025, Da Xie wrote:
> > 
> > > Add check for constrained auto type specifier in function declaration or
> > > function type declaration with trailing return type. Issue error if such
> > > usage is detected.
> > > 
> > > Test file renamed, and added a new test for type declaration.
> > > 
> > > Successfully bootstrapped and regretested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
> > > Added 6 passed and 4 unsupported tests.
> > > 
> > >   PR c++/100589
> > > 
> > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > > 
> > >   * decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Issue an error for a declarator with
> > >   constrained auto type specifier and trailing return types. Include
> > >   function names if available.
> > > 
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > 
> > >   * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C: New test.
> > 
> > LGTM, thanks!  Jason, shall I push this to trunk?
> 
> Pushed as r15-7834-g7439febd94368f.
> 
Many thanks! I'm a GCC newbie, and this reviewing process has taught me a lot.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Da Xie <xxie...@163.com>
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/cp/decl.cc                                 | 13 +++++++++++++
> > >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C |  9 +++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> > > index 9ca8c6c4481..337ee65752e 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> > > @@ -14037,6 +14037,19 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator,
> > >                           "invalid use of %<decltype(auto)%>");
> > >               return error_mark_node;
> > >             }
> > > +         else if (is_constrained_auto (type))
> > > +           {
> > > +             if (funcdecl_p)
> > > +               error_at (typespec_loc,
> > > +                         "%qs function with trailing return type "
> > > +                         "has constrained %<auto%> type specifier "
> > > +                         "rather than plain %<auto%>",
> > > +                         name);
> > > +             else
> > > +               error_at (typespec_loc,
> > > +                         "invalid use of constrained %<auto%> type");
> > > +             return error_mark_node;
> > > +           }
> > >           tree tmpl = CLASS_PLACEHOLDER_TEMPLATE (auto_node);
> > >           if (!tmpl)
> > >             if (tree late_auto = type_uses_auto (late_return_type))
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C 
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..0c60d31f29b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr100589.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > > +// PR c++/100589
> > > +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
> > > +
> > > +template<class T>
> > > +concept false_concept = false;
> > > +
> > > +false_concept auto f() -> int; // { dg-error "'f' .* trailing return 
> > > type.* constrained 'auto'" }
> > 
> > I can replace the use of .* with \[^\r\n\]* before pushing.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +using type = false_concept auto() -> int; // { dg-error "invalid use of 
> > > constrained 'auto' type"}
> 
> N.B. I added a missing space between the " and } that caused this
> dircetive to get ignored.
> 
Sorry for the misses. I fixed and checked it locally, and the test
passed.
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > 

Reply via email to