> I added the negative step check just some weeks ago and I'd see it as > simplification to remove the restriction again if you're touching the actual > step anyway. So I wouldn't worry about stage 4 in that regard.
Oh, I see. I'll have a try after this bug fix. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 7:44 PM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; Robin Dapp <rdapp....@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Fix bug for expand_const_vector interleave [PR118931] > I don't explore more cases here consider we are in stage 4. I think the > expand_const_vector need some refactor up to a point. I added the negative step check just some weeks ago and I'd see it as simplification to remove the restriction again if you're touching the actual step anyway. So I wouldn't worry about stage 4 in that regard. -- Regards Robin
