On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 06:23, François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 20/02/2025 18:28, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2025-02-20T16:36:56+0000, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 20/02/25 15:50 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> >From 820e015494e25187c9a5ffbd69911ec6ce612789 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
> >>> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:08:11 +0000
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix 'libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc' build for 
> >>> '__GTHREADS &&
> >>> !__GTHREADS_CXX0X' configurations
> >>>
> >>>     libstdc++-v3/
> >>>     * src/c++20/tzdb.cc [__GTHREADS && !__GTHREADS_CXX0X]: Use
> >>>     '__gnu_cxx::__mutex'.
> >>>
> >>> Co-authored-by: Thomas Schwinge <tschwi...@baylibre.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc | 8 +++++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc 
> >>> b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc
> >>> index 7e8cce7ce8c..70ba7b0ef53 100644
> >>> --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc
> >>> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc
> >>> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> >>> #include <atomic>     // atomic<T*>, atomic<int>
> >>> #include <memory>     // atomic<shared_ptr<T>>
> >>> #include <mutex>      // mutex
> >>> +#if defined __GTHREADS && ! defined _GLIBCXX_HAS_GHTREADS
> >>> +# include <ext/concurrence.h> // __gnu_cxx::__mutex
> >>> +#endif
> >>> #include <filesystem> // filesystem::read_symlink
> >>>
> >>> #ifndef _AIX
> >>> @@ -97,11 +100,14 @@ namespace std::chrono
> >>> {
> >>>    namespace
> >>>    {
> >>> -#if ! USE_ATOMIC_SHARED_PTR
> >>> #ifndef __GTHREADS
> >>>      // Dummy no-op mutex type for single-threaded targets.
> >>>      struct mutex { void lock() { } void unlock() { } };
> >>> +#elif ! defined _GLIBCXX_HAS_GHTREADS
> >> This still has my GHTREADS typo.
> > Eh.  I had fixed that, but apparently lost it.  Re-fixed.
> >
> >> A comment here would be good too:
> >>
> >>       // Use __gnu_cxx::__mutex is std::mutex isn't available.
> > Added.
>
> Minor but comment was added with alas the small typo to say 'if' rather
> than 'is':
>
>       // Use __gnu_cxx::__mutex if std::mutex isn't available.


Ah yes, thanks.

It looks like Thomas hasn't pushed it yet, so I hope he can fix that
before pushing.

Reply via email to