Hi Andre,
Am 21.02.25 um 14:35 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi all,
during testing and compiling some larger coarray codes, I found a few
deficiencies. One was with handling class types when splitting the coarray
expression and the other was that the backend_decl of a formal argument in a
function's symbol was not the same as the one the function was compiled to. So
looking at the function-decl's tree n-th formal argument is the way to go there.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
I am amazed that you do not get lost handling 9-fold nested
macros! This is OK, as this touches your CAF code.
Otherwise, I'd recommend to add an explaining comment in the
code or code such that mere mortals have a better chance to
follow...
Thanks,
Harald
Regards,
Andre
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
