gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c started failing after
r15-268-g9dbff9c05520, but the change was an improvement:

@@ -36,13 +36,11 @@
        b.any   .L9
        ret
 .L17:
-       ubfiz   x5, x3, 10, 16
-       ubfiz   x4, x2, 10, 16
-       add     x5, x1, x5
-       add     x4, x0, x4
-       cmp     x0, x5
-       ccmp    x1, x4, 2, ls
        uxtw    x4, w2
+       add     x6, x1, x3, lsl 10
+       cmp     x0, x6
+       add     x5, x0, x4, lsl 10
+       ccmp    x1, x5, 2, ls
        ccmp    w2, 0, 4, hi
        beq     .L3
        cntb    x7

This patch therefore changes the test to expect the new output
for var_stride_2.c.

The changes for var_stride_4.c were a wash, with both versions
having 18(!) arithmetic instructions before the alias check branch.
Both versions sign-extend the n and m arguments as part of this
sequence; the question is whether they do it first or later.

This patch therefore changes the test to accept either the old
or the new code for var_stride_4.c

Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.  I'll leave a day or so before pushing,
in case anyone has any objections or counter-suggestions.

Richard


gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c: Expect ADD+LSL.
        * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c: Accept LSL or SBFIZ.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c | 3 +--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c
index b8afea70207..33b9f0f197e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_2.c
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ f (TYPE *x, TYPE *y, unsigned short n, unsigned short m)
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tldr\tw[0-9]+} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tstr\tw[0-9]+} } } */
 /* Should multiply by (257-1)*4 rather than (VF-1)*4 or (VF-2)*4.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tubfiz\tx[0-9]+, x2, 10, 16\n} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tubfiz\tx[0-9]+, x3, 10, 16\n} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tadd\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, lsl 
10\n} 2 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tcmp\tx[0-9]+, 0} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tcmp\tw[0-9]+, 0} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tcsel\tx[0-9]+} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c
index d2e74f9d417..71b826a4c1b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/var_stride_4.c
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ f (TYPE *x, TYPE *y, int n, int m)
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tldr\tw[0-9]+} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tstr\tw[0-9]+} } } */
 /* Should multiply by (257-1)*4 rather than (VF-1)*4.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tsbfiz\tx[0-9]+, x2, 10, 32\n} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tsbfiz\tx[0-9]+, x3, 10, 32\n} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\t(?:lsl\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 
10|sbfiz\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 10, 32)\n} 2 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tcmp\tw2, 0} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tcmp\tw3, 0} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tcsel\tx[0-9]+} 4 } } */
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to