Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?

-- >8 --

- Use __builtin_unreachable to suppress a false-positive "control
  reaches end of non-void function" warning in the recursive lambda
  (which the existing tests failed to notice since test01 wasn't
  being called at runtime)
- Relax the constraints on views::concat in the single-argument case
  as per PR115215
- Add an input_range requirement to that same case as per LWG 4082
- In the const-converting constructor of concat_view's iterator,
  don't require the first iterator to be default constructible

        PR libstdc++/115215
        PR libstdc++/115218

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        * include/std/ranges
        (concat_view::iterator::_S_invoke_with_runtime_index): Use
        __builtin_unreachable in recursive lambda to certify it always
        exits via 'return'.
        (concat_view::iterator::iterator): In the const-converting
        constructor, direct initialize _M_it.
        (views::_Concat::operator()): Adjust constraints in the
        single-argument case as per LWG 4082.
        * testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc (test01): Call it at runtime
        too.
        (test04): New test.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges               | 28 +++++++++----------
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc | 16 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index 22e0c9cae44..a56dae43625 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -9919,6 +9919,7 @@ namespace ranges
            return __f.template operator()<_Idx>();
          if constexpr (_Idx + 1 < sizeof...(_Vs))
            return __self.template operator()<_Idx + 1>();
+         __builtin_unreachable();
        }.template operator()<0>();
       }
 
@@ -9940,12 +9941,12 @@ namespace ranges
     constexpr
     iterator(iterator<!_Const> __it)
       requires _Const && (convertible_to<iterator_t<_Vs>, iterator_t<const 
_Vs>> && ...)
-    : _M_parent(__it._M_parent)
-    {
-      _M_invoke_with_runtime_index([this, &__it]<size_t _Idx>() {
-       _M_it.template emplace<_Idx>(std::get<_Idx>(std::move(__it._M_it)));
-      });
-    }
+    : _M_parent(__it._M_parent),
+      _M_it(_S_invoke_with_runtime_index([this, &__it]<size_t _Idx>() {
+             return __base_iter(in_place_index<_Idx>,
+                                std::get<_Idx>(std::move(__it._M_it)));
+           }, __it._M_it.index()))
+    { }
 
     constexpr decltype(auto)
     operator*() const
@@ -10179,16 +10180,15 @@ namespace ranges
 
     struct _Concat
     {
-      template<typename... _Ts>
-       requires __detail::__can_concat_view<_Ts...>
+      template<__detail::__can_concat_view... _Ts>
       constexpr auto
       operator() [[nodiscard]] (_Ts&&... __ts) const
-      {
-       if constexpr (sizeof...(_Ts) == 1)
-         return views::all(std::forward<_Ts>(__ts)...);
-       else
-         return concat_view(std::forward<_Ts>(__ts)...);
-      }
+      { return concat_view(std::forward<_Ts>(__ts)...); }
+
+      template<input_range _Range>
+      constexpr auto
+      operator() [[nodiscard]] (_Range&& __t) const
+      { return views::all(std::forward<_Range>(__t)); }
     };
 
     inline constexpr _Concat concat;
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc
index e5d10f476e9..16721912a37 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/concat/1.cc
@@ -85,10 +85,26 @@ test03()
   VERIFY( ranges::equal(view2, std::vector{4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3}) );
 }
 
+void
+test04()
+{
+  // PR libstdc++/115215 - views::concat rejects non-movable reference
+  int x[] = {1,2,3};
+  struct nomove {
+    nomove() = default;
+    nomove(const nomove&) = delete;
+  };
+  auto v = x | views::transform([](int) { return nomove{}; });
+  using type = decltype(views::concat(v));
+  using type = decltype(v);
+}
+
 int
 main()
 {
   static_assert(test01());
+  test01();
   test02();
   test03();
+  test04();
 }
-- 
2.48.1.356.g0394451348.dirty

Reply via email to