Hi!
On 2019-06-20T12:39:48+0200, Tom de Vries <tdevr...@suse.de> wrote:
> Add missing dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto.
>
> Tested on nvptx.
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /* PR rtl-optimization/88870 */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto } */
> /* { dg-options "-O1 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv
> -fno-tree-dominator-opts" } */
Pushed to trunk branch commit 0e602b2315f3cdf9a50441b28cabb8b204827492
"'gcc.dg/pr88870.c': don't 'dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto'",
see attached.
Grüße
Thomas
>From 0e602b2315f3cdf9a50441b28cabb8b204827492 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tschwi...@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:14:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] 'gcc.dg/pr88870.c': don't 'dg-require-effective-target
nonlocal_goto'
I confirm that back then, 'gcc.dg/pr88870.c' for nvptx failed due to
'sorry, unimplemented: target cannot support nonlocal goto', however at some
(indeterminate) point in time, that must've disappeared, and we now don't have
to 'dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto' anymore, and therefore get:
[-UNSUPPORTED:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/pr88870.c {+(test for excess errors)+}
(And, if ever necessary again, this nowadays probably should
'dg-require-effective-target exceptions' instead of 'nonlocal_goto'.)
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr88870.c: Don't 'dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto'.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c
index 81f686bd972..3f46f32f3ee 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
/* PR rtl-optimization/88870 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target nonlocal_goto } */
/* { dg-options "-O1 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv -fno-tree-dominator-opts" } */
int a, b;
--
2.34.1
