Hi!

My r15-3046 change regressed the first half of the following testcase.
When it calls decl_attributes, it doesn't handle attributes with
dependent arguments correctly and so is now rejected that N is not
a constant integer during template parsing.

I've actually followed the pointer/reference case which did that
too and that one has been failing for a couple of years on the
second part of the testcase.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Note, there is also
          if (decl_context != PARM && decl_context != TYPENAME)
            /* Assume that any attributes that get applied late to
               templates will DTRT when applied to the declaration
               as a whole.  */
            late_attrs = splice_template_attributes (&attrs, type);
          returned_attrs = decl_attributes (&type,
                                            attr_chainon (returned_attrs,
                                                          attrs),
                                            attr_flags);
          returned_attrs = attr_chainon (late_attrs, returned_attrs);
call directly to decl_attributes in grokdeclarator, but this one handles
the splicing manually, so maybe it is ok as is (and I don't have a testcase
of anything misbehaving for that).

2025-02-06  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/118773
        * decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Use cplus_decl_attributes rather than
        decl_attributes for std_attributes on pointer and array types.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-87.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-3.C: Adjust expected diagnostics.

--- gcc/cp/decl.cc.jj   2025-02-06 09:01:25.600721993 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/decl.cc      2025-02-06 15:59:20.707070240 +0100
@@ -13846,7 +13846,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec
 
               The optional attribute-specifier-seq appertains to the
               array type.  */
-           decl_attributes (&type, declarator->std_attributes, 0);
+           cplus_decl_attributes (&type, declarator->std_attributes, 0);
          break;
 
        case cdk_function:
@@ -14522,8 +14522,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec
                 [the optional attribute-specifier-seq (7.6.1) appertains
                  to the pointer and not to the object pointed to].  */
          if (declarator->std_attributes)
-           decl_attributes (&type, declarator->std_attributes,
-                            0);
+           cplus_decl_attributes (&type, declarator->std_attributes, 0);
 
          ctype = NULL_TREE;
          break;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-87.C.jj        2025-02-06 
16:14:27.247387432 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-87.C   2025-02-06 16:13:57.413804728 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/118773
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+template <unsigned N>
+using T = char[4] [[gnu::aligned (N)]];
+T<2> t;
+template <unsigned N>
+using U = char *[[gnu::aligned (N)]]*;
+U<__alignof (char *)> u;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/attrs-3.C.jj      2024-08-30 16:09:01.230290254 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/attrs-3.C 2025-02-06 19:23:02.331719653 +0100
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ foo ()
     i++;
   auto a = [] () [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t1))]] {};   // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
   int [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t2))]] b;               // { dg-warning 
"attribute ignored" }
-  int *[[omp::directive (threadprivate (t3))]] c;              // { dg-warning 
"'omp::directive' scoped attribute directive ignored" }
-  int &[[omp::directive (threadprivate (t4))]] d = b;          // { dg-warning 
"'omp::directive' scoped attribute directive ignored" }
+  int *[[omp::directive (threadprivate (t3))]] c;              // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
+  int &[[omp::directive (threadprivate (t4))]] d = b;          // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
   typedef int T [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t5))]];       // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
   int e [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t6))]] [10];          // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
-  int f[10] [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t6))]];           // { dg-warning 
"'omp::directive' scoped attribute directive ignored" }
+  int f[10] [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t6))]];           // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
   struct [[omp::directive (threadprivate (t7))]] S {};         // { dg-error 
"'omp::directive' not allowed to be specified in this context" }
 }

        Jakub

Reply via email to