The test case assumes that alignof(int)=sizeof(int). But for some
targets this is not valid. For example, for PRU target,
alignof(int)=1 but sizeof(int)=4.
Fix the test case to align to twice the size of int, as the expected
dg-error messages suggest.
This patch fixes the test failures for PRU target.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr116357.c: Use sizeof(int) instead of alignof(int).
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimi...@dinux.eu>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116357.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116357.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116357.c
index 07effa13254..12aaf62c20d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116357.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr116357.c
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "" } */
-typedef int A __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef int A __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
A a[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than
element size" } */
-typedef volatile int B __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef volatile int B __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
B b[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than
element size" } */
-typedef const int C __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef const int C __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
C c[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than
element size" } */
--
2.48.1
