On 1/28/25 8:04 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > ...do you think this would be better off being called > ppc_not_well_defined_denormals > or something like that?
It's better than ppc_default_long_double_not_ieee! :-) Peter
On 1/28/25 8:04 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > ...do you think this would be better off being called > ppc_not_well_defined_denormals > or something like that?
It's better than ppc_default_long_double_not_ieee! :-) Peter