On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 06:57:22 PST (-0800), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/16/25 7:31 PM, Li, Pan2 wrote:
It is 627.cam4_s or 527.cam4_r? I can help to reproduce this from k1 board.
I'd also suggest checking the test/train inputs before going to ref.
Ya, and thanks for the help. For anyone else watching, the rest is over here:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/78a20579-2d29-4b3b-af94-434dde755...@rivosinc.com/
(inbox.sourceware.org doesn't seem to handle threading across lists) --
it certainly looked like a glibc issue at first, so it ended up over
there.
On a sort of related note: last night/this morning I realized that if
calling into glibc with RMM set is UB, then aren't we going to open
ourselves up issues like getting a signal in the middle of an inlined
__builtin_{l,}round() expansion? Maybe fast-math/sigals are far enough
down the rabbit hole nobody cares, though?
jeff
