On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 at 02:37, Aditya K <hiradi...@msn.com> wrote: > > From db5036e40ed7ac43b66ca74c44ec8d0bdc934b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: AdityaK <1108430...@users.noreply.github.com> > Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:14:29 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Use string::push_back instead of > string::operator+= > > operator+= returns string& which is ignored anyways.
Why does this matter? The compiler can see that the return value isn't used. Using += seems more readable to me. > --- > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ > libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog > index 9ab5eeb55a5..be90bfd47e8 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ > +2024-12-29 Aditya Kumar <hiradi...@msn.com> > + * include/bits/basic_string.tcc (getline): Use string::push_back > + instead of string::operator+= > + > + The ChangeLog file is automatically updated every night based on the commits to Git, please don't patch it (this has been the case for many years). > 2024-12-29 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> > > * doc/html/manual/profile_mode_diagnostics.html: Delete. > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > index caeddaf2f5b..ddb41c8e7e2 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc > @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION > && !_Traits::eq_int_type(__c, __eof) > && !_Traits::eq_int_type(__c, __idelim)) > { > - __str += _Traits::to_char_type(__c); > + __str.push_back(_Traits::to_char_type(__c)); > ++__extracted; > __c = __in.rdbuf()->snextc(); > } > -- > 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog > > >