On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> to handle the "const << reg" case.  Or would it be better to make the
> lshift_cheap_p try out more shifty things?
The simpler lshift_cheap stays, the better. It's already warty to have
to look at rtx_cost in a GIMPLE pass.

Ciao!
Steven

Reply via email to