There was a cut&pasto in the rr_and_mask's adjustment to match the
combined type: the test on whether there was a mask already was
testing the wrong variable, and then it might crash or otherwise fail
accessing an undefined mask.  This only hit with checking enabled,
and rarely at that.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?


for  gcc/ChangeLog

        PR tree-optimization/118344
        * gimple-fold.cc (fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine): Fix typo in
        rr_and_mask's type adjustment test.

for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        PR tree-optimization/118344
        * gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c: New.
---
 gcc/gimple-fold.cc                    |    2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
index 0ad92de3a218f..20b5024d861db 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
@@ -8644,7 +8644,7 @@ fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine (enum tree_code code, tree 
truth_type,
                          xlr_bitpos);
       else
        lr_mask = wi::shifted_mask (xlr_bitpos, lr_bitsize, false, rnprec);
-      if (rl_and_mask.get_precision ())
+      if (rr_and_mask.get_precision ())
        rr_mask = wi::lshift (wide_int::from (rr_and_mask, rnprec, UNSIGNED),
                              xrr_bitpos);
       else
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..5622baa52b0a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-19.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fchecking" } */
+
+/* PR tree-optimization/118344 */
+
+/* This used to ICE attempting to extend a mask variable after testing the
+   wrong mask variable.  */
+
+int d, e, g, h, i, c, j;
+static short k;
+char o;
+static int *p;
+static long *a;
+int b[0];
+int q(int s, int t, int *u, int *v) {
+  for (int f = 0; f < s; f++)
+    if ((t & v[f]) != u[f])
+      return 0;
+  return 1;
+}
+int w(int s, int t) {
+  int l[] = {t, t, t, t}, m[] = {e, e, 3, 1};
+  int n = q(s, d, l, m);
+  return n;
+}
+int x(unsigned s) {
+  unsigned r;
+  if (s >= -1)
+    return 1;
+  r = 10000000;
+  while (s > 1 / r)
+    r /= 2;
+  return g ? 2 : 0;
+}
+void y() {
+  for (;;) {
+    b[w(8, *p)] = h;
+    for (; a + k; j = o)
+      i &= c = x(6) < 0;
+  }
+}

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist                   GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive

Reply via email to