On 20/07/2012 12:19, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Mikael: I wouldn't mind if you could have a look at the scalarizer - you
> seem to have an idea how one can implement it with minimal effort/code
> cluttering.
This is exaggerated. I just said that the scalarizer can't generate a
variable number of loops.
I can have a look next week. Could you post what is left from your
initial {l,u}bound patch? It has been raining assumed rank patches and
I'm lost now.> > > Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. > OK for the trunk? > OK. Mikael
