> OK for the trunk. Sorry for the delay. Never mind, thanks Jeff and Happ New Year, 😉!
Pan -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Law <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 9:32 PM To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] Match: Refactor the signed SAT_SUB match patterns [NFC] On 1/6/25 7:47 PM, Li, Pan2 wrote: > Kindly ping for the series> > Pan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Li, Pan2 > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 3:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/4] Match: Refactor the signed SAT_SUB match patterns > [NFC] > > Kindly ping for this series, and Merry Christmas! > > Pan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 4:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Li, Pan2 <[email protected]> > Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] Match: Refactor the signed SAT_SUB match patterns > [NFC] > > From: Pan Li <[email protected]> > > This patch would like to refactor the all signed SAT_ADD patterns, > aka: > * Extract type check outside. > * Re-arrange the related match pattern forms together. > > The below test suites are passed for this patch. > * The rv64gcv fully regression test. > * The x86 bootstrap test. > * The x86 fully regression test. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * match.pd: Refactor sorts of signed SAT_SUB match patterns. OK for the trunk. Sorry for the delay. jeff
