On 20/07/12 17:52, Julian Brown wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:24:36 +0100 > Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: > >> On 20/07/12 11:35, Julian Brown wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On several architectures, the test >>> gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c tests the raising of a signal >>> when a division by zero occurs, but at present the test is simply >>> skipped on ARM. We can make the test slightly more useful by using >>> the EABI-provided ability to define a division-by-zero handling >>> function which raises SIGFPE -- thus mimicking the behaviour of >>> other targets, and allowing us to run the test as intended. >>> >>> If the target has hardware integer division instructions, the test >>> is still skipped. >>> >>> The new test passes for a bare-metal config. OK to apply? >>> >> >> Which permutations (CPU, ARM, Thumb) did you test? >> >> R. > > On mainline, merely the defaults for an arm-none-eabi toolchain, i.e. > armv4t, -marm and -mthumb. On our internal branches (where a version > of the patch has been present for some time), a much wider set of CPUs, > including Cortex-M's and so forth with hardware multiplication > instructions. > > (The list is approximately: ARMv4 ARM & Thumb, ARMv5te ARM mode with & > without VFP, various ARMv7-A configs including ARM & Thumb-2 mode, > Cortex-M3 & VFP-enabled Cortex-M4.) > > Julian >
OK, I'm happy with that. R.
