Hi Harald,
the patch looks ok to me.
Thanks for the patch,
Andre
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 19:00:05 +0100
Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Ping!
>
> Am 14.12.24 um 20:56 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > this patch is the 4th part of a series on the passing of NULL() to
> > assumed-rank dummies. This one handles the case of a derived type
> > dummy and is mostly straightforward.
> >
> > There was one particular problem I encountered: passing NULL() to
> > an allocatable dummy with no intent given. This lead to an ICE
> > I could not resolve other than treating this the same as if an
> > intent(in) were given. If someone has a better idea, I'd love
> > to learn about it...
> >
> > Testcase cross-checked with Intel's ifx.
> >
> > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harald
> >
> > P.S.: if someone would like to assist with the case of class
> > dummies, please let me know.
> >
>
>
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
