The fuzzer tripped over a risc-v target issue in the expansion of CRCs. In particular we want to use brev instruction to improve the reflection code.

In the case where the item to be reflected is smaller than a word we would end up triggering an ICE due to mode mismatching since the expansion code asks for the operation in word_mode.

I was briefly confused by the multiple calls into this code, but we have to reflect multiple values and those calls may be reflecting different sized items. So seeing one in SI, then another in QI is sensible.

The fix is pretty simple. In theory the item being reflected should always be word_size or smaller. So an assertion is added to verify that. If the item's size is smaller than a word, we can use a paradoxical subreg. The logical right shift after the brev should zero out any extraneous bits.

It's unclear why we're passing a pointer to an RTX in this code. I left that as-is, but we can simplify the code a little bit by doing the dereference early and using the dereferenced value.


Tested on rv64 and rv32 with no regressions. I'll push to the trunk once the pre-commit CI tester is done.

Jeff

        PR middle-end/118084
gcc/
        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (generate_reflecting_code_using_brev): Handle
        sub-word sized objects correctly.

gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/;riscv/;pr118084.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 4f1f9defc80..1374868eddf 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -13602,18 +13602,27 @@ riscv_use_by_pieces_infrastructure_p (unsigned 
HOST_WIDE_INT size,
    we will get the desired one: 1000 1111.  */
 
 void
-generate_reflecting_code_using_brev (rtx *op)
+generate_reflecting_code_using_brev (rtx *op_p)
 {
-  machine_mode op_mode = GET_MODE (*op);
+  rtx op = *op_p;
+  machine_mode op_mode = GET_MODE (op);
+
+  /* OP may be smaller than a word.  We can use a paradoxical subreg
+     to compensate for that.  It should never be larger than a word
+     for RISC-V.  */
+  gcc_assert (op_mode <= word_mode);
+  if (op_mode != word_mode)
+    op = gen_lowpart (word_mode, op);
+
   HOST_WIDE_INT shift_val = (BITS_PER_WORD
                             - GET_MODE_BITSIZE (op_mode).to_constant ());
-  riscv_expand_op (BSWAP, word_mode, *op, *op, *op);
-  riscv_expand_op (LSHIFTRT, word_mode, *op, *op,
+  riscv_expand_op (BSWAP, word_mode, op, op, op);
+  riscv_expand_op (LSHIFTRT, word_mode, op, op,
                   gen_int_mode (shift_val, word_mode));
   if (TARGET_64BIT)
-    emit_insn (gen_riscv_brev8_di (*op, *op));
+    emit_insn (gen_riscv_brev8_di (op, op));
   else
-    emit_insn (gen_riscv_brev8_si (*op, *op));
+    emit_insn (gen_riscv_brev8_si (op, op));
 }
 
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr118084.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr118084.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2ffa1d76c9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr118084.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=rv32izk -mabi=ilp32 -Os" } */
+unsigned a;
+int main() {
+  int b = 8;
+  for (; b; b--)
+    if (a & 1)
+      a = a >> 1 ^ 30196000;
+    else
+      a >>= 1;
+}
+
+

Reply via email to