On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:43:45AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/12/24 1:42 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > 
> > -- >8 --
> > This ICE started with the recent prvalue optimization (r15-6052).  In
> > cp_fold_r we have:
> > 
> >        if (tree &init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (stmt))
> >          {
> >            cp_walk_tree (&init, cp_fold_r, data, NULL);
> >            // ...
> >       tree folded = maybe_constant_init (init, TARGET_EXPR_SLOT (stmt));
> > 
> > What can happen here is that originally the TARGET_EXPR is:
> > 
> >      TARGET_EXPR <D.2747, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr
> >        5
> >        __ct_comp
> >        D.2747
> >        (struct subrange *) <<< Unknown tree: void_cst >>>
> >        &TARGET_EXPR <D.2707, {.it=TARGET_EXPR <D.2695, ...>}> >>>>
> > 
> > but after the first cp_walk_tree we fold the D.2707 TARGET_EXPR into:
> > 
> >      TARGET_EXPR <D.2707, <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
> >        D.2707.it = TARGET_EXPR <D.2695, ...> >>>>
> > 
> > and then we pass the EXPR_STMT to maybe_constant_init, with D.2707 as
> > the object.  But their types don't match anymore, so we crash.  We'd
> > have to pass D.2707.it as the object for it to work.
> > 
> > But I don't think we need to pass any object to maybe_constant_init;
> > it'll grab the appropriate one itself.
> 
> Hmm, it seems to me that the crash is happening because the deduced type is
> wrong, and so with this change we'll end up only producing an initializer
> for the first member.  Because cp_fold_r throws away the information that
> initialized_type needs to know the type of the complete object being
> initialized.

Thanks for catching that.
 
> What if we move cp_fold_r of init after the maybe_constant_init?

Sadly, the same crash.

But your idea works, so this is it in a patch form.  Thanks again.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
This ICE started with the recent prvalue optimization (r15-6052).  In
cp_fold_r we have:

      if (tree &init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (stmt))
        {
          cp_walk_tree (&init, cp_fold_r, data, NULL);
          // ...
          tree folded = maybe_constant_init (init, TARGET_EXPR_SLOT (stmt));

What can happen here is that originally the TARGET_EXPR is:

    TARGET_EXPR <D.2747, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr
      5
      __ct_comp
      D.2747
      (struct subrange *) <<< Unknown tree: void_cst >>>
      &TARGET_EXPR <D.2707, {.it=TARGET_EXPR <D.2695, ...>}> >>>>

but after the first cp_walk_tree we fold the D.2707 TARGET_EXPR into:

    TARGET_EXPR <D.2707, <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
      D.2707.it = TARGET_EXPR <D.2695, ...> >>>>

and then we pass the EXPR_STMT to maybe_constant_init, with D.2707 as
the object.  But their types don't match anymore, so we crash.  We'd
have to pass D.2707.it as the object for it to work.

This patch adjusts cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr to take the object's
type if available.

constexpr-prvalue3.C is reduced from a large std::ranges libstdc++ test.

        PR c++/117980

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): If there's
        an object to initialize, take its type.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C: New test.

Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.cc                           |  4 ++-
 .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C         | 15 +++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C         | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index c16597dfaec..f941a1eabd8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -8870,7 +8870,9 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool 
allow_non_constant,
   /* Turn off -frounding-math for manifestly constant evaluation.  */
   warning_sentinel rm (flag_rounding_math,
                       ctx.manifestly_const_eval == mce_true);
-  tree type = initialized_type (t);
+  tree type = (object
+              ? cv_unqualified (TREE_TYPE (object))
+              : initialized_type (t));
   tree r = t;
   bool is_consteval = false;
   if (VOID_TYPE_P (type))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..46053231cf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/117980
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O" }
+
+struct S {
+  constexpr S(S &); // { dg-warning "used but never defined" }
+  ~S();
+};
+struct B {
+  S s;
+};
+struct A {
+  B b;
+};
+void fn(B b) { A{b}; }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a2eb12c02d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// PR c++/117980
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O" }
+
+struct _Safe_iterator  {
+ _Safe_iterator();
+  ~_Safe_iterator();
+};
+template <typename _Tp>
+struct vector {
+  vector(int) {}
+  constexpr _Safe_iterator end() {
+    return _Safe_iterator();
+  }
+};
+template <typename It> struct sentinel {
+  It it;
+};
+template <typename _Sent>
+struct subrange {
+  subrange(sentinel<_Safe_iterator>) {}
+};
+void test01() {
+  vector<int> v{0};
+  subrange<sentinel<_Safe_iterator>>{sentinel<_Safe_iterator>{v.end()}};
+}

base-commit: 17d8a3da25cd5262df1075b210cb4fa707c527df
-- 
2.47.1

Reply via email to