On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 12:48:35PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/6/24 12:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:15:49PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 12/4/24 12:27 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 04:27:22PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > On 12/3/24 2:46 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:04:56PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > > > On 11/27/24 9:06 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > > > > Not a bugfix, but this should only affect C++26.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- >8--
> > > > > > > > This patch implements P2865R5 by promoting the warning to error
> > > > > > > > in C++26
> > > > > > > > only. -Wno-array-compare shouldn't disable the error, so
> > > > > > > > adjust the call
> > > > > > > > sites as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think it's fine for -Wno-array-compare to suppress the error
> > > > > > > (and
> > > > > > > -Wno-error=array-compare to reduce it to a warning), so how about
> > > > > > > DK_PERMERROR rather than DK_ERROR?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good.
> > > > > > > We also need SFINAE for this when !tf_warning_or_error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've added Warray-compare-1.C, which has:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > template<int I>
> > > > > > void f (int(*)[arr1 == arr2 ? I : I]);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but when we call cp_build_binary_op from the parser, complain is
> > > > > > tf_warning_or_error, so we warn (as does clang++). I suspect
> > > > > > that goes against [temp.deduct.general]/8.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, that's fine; in C++26 that template is IFNDR because no
> > > > > well-formed
> > > > > instantiation exists, it's OK for us to give a diagnostic and then
> > > > > continue
> > > > > just like in a non-template.
> > > >
> > > > Ah yes.
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure there is a SFINAE situation where this would come up,
> > > > > but I'd
> > > > > still like to adjust this:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -6125,11 +6124,10 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
> > > > > > &location,
> > > > > > "comparison with string literal results
> > > > > > "
> > > > > > "in unspecified behavior");
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > - else if (warn_array_compare
> > > > > > - && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
> > > > > > + else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
> > > > > > && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)) == ARRAY_TYPE
> > > > > > && code != SPACESHIP_EXPR
> > > > > > - && (complain & tf_warning))
> > > > > > + && (complain & tf_warning_or_error))
> > > > > > do_warn_array_compare (location, code,
> > > > > > tree_strip_any_location_wrapper
> > > > > > (orig_op0),
> > > > > > tree_strip_any_location_wrapper
> > > > > > (orig_op1));
> > > > >
> > > > > If we happen to get here when not complaining, we'll silently accept
> > > > > it.
> > > > > Either we should handle that case by returning error_mark_node in
> > > > > C++26 and
> > > > > above, or we should assert that it can't happen.
> > > >
> > > > We actually can get there. But returning error_mark_node in C++26
> > > > causes problems: we hit:
> > > >
> > > > /* If we ran into a problem, make sure we complained. */
> > > > gcc_assert (seen_error ());
> > > >
> > > > because a permerror doesn't count as an error. Either we'd have to go
> > > > back to DK_ERROR, or leave the patch as-is.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I guess cp_seen_error should also consider werrorcount.
> >
> > That still wouldn't work with -Wno-array-compare. Nor would adding
> > permerrorcount.
> >
> > I suppose I could still add permerrorcount and do permerrorcount++;,
> > and have cp_seen_error check permerrorcount. Does that seem acceptable?
>
> If we didn't actually give an error, we shouldn't return error_mark_node.
> That's what the assert is checking, and it's important to preserve that
> property (outside of SFINAE). An error_mark_node without an error means
> silently generating garbage.
Hopefully done correctly in the following patch.
conditionally_borrowed.cc regressed with this patch as described below,
so I adjusted the test.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
Thanks,
-- >8 --
This patch implements P2865R5 by promoting the warning to permerror in
C++26 only.
In C++20 we should warn even without -Wall. Jason fixed this in r15-5713
but let's add a test that doesn't use -Wall.
This caused a FAIL in conditionally_borrowed.cc because we end up
comparing two array types in equality_comparable_with ->
__weakly_eq_cmp_with. That could be fixed in libstc++, perhaps by
adding std::decay in the appropriate place.
PR c++/117788
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-warn.cc (do_warn_array_compare): Emit a permerror in C++26.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck.cc (cp_build_binary_op) <case EQ_EXPR>: Don't check
warn_array_compare. Check tf_warning_or_error instead of just
tf_warning. Maybe return an error_mark_node in C++26.
<case LE_EXPR>: Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c: Expect an error in C++26.
* c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c: Likewise.
* c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C: New test.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc: Add a
FIXME, adjust.
---
gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc | 25 +++++++--
gcc/cp/typeck.cc | 55 +++++++++++--------
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c | 21 ++++---
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c | 7 ++-
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c | 44 +++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C | 26 +++++++++
.../ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc | 5 +-
8 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
index 140d97a00d8..0b71842e48d 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
@@ -3820,8 +3820,9 @@ maybe_warn_sizeof_array_div (location_t loc, tree arr,
tree arr_type,
/* Warn about C++20 [depr.array.comp] array comparisons: "Equality
and relational comparisons between two operands of array type are
- deprecated." We also warn in C and earlier C++ standards. CODE is
- the code for this comparison, OP0 and OP1 are the operands. */
+ deprecated." In C++26 this is a permerror. We also warn in C and earlier
+ C++ standards. CODE is the code for this comparison, OP0 and OP1 are
+ the operands. */
void
do_warn_array_compare (location_t location, tree_code code, tree op0, tree op1)
@@ -3834,10 +3835,22 @@ do_warn_array_compare (location_t location, tree_code
code, tree op0, tree op1)
op1 = TREE_OPERAND (op1, 0);
auto_diagnostic_group d;
- if (warning_at (location, OPT_Warray_compare,
- (c_dialect_cxx () && cxx_dialect >= cxx20)
- ? G_("comparison between two arrays is deprecated in C++20")
- : G_("comparison between two arrays")))
+ diagnostic_t kind = DK_WARNING;
+ const char *msg;
+ if (c_dialect_cxx () && cxx_dialect >= cxx20)
+ {
+ /* P2865R5 made this comparison ill-formed in C++26. */
+ if (cxx_dialect >= cxx26)
+ {
+ msg = G_("comparison between two arrays is not allowed in C++26");
+ kind = DK_PERMERROR;
+ }
+ else
+ msg = G_("comparison between two arrays is deprecated in C++20");
+ }
+ else
+ msg = G_("comparison between two arrays");
+ if (emit_diagnostic (kind, location, OPT_Warray_compare, msg))
{
/* C doesn't allow +arr. */
if (c_dialect_cxx ())
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
index adc71132721..b35eb4d17cc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
@@ -5830,23 +5830,27 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location,
warning_at (location, OPT_Wfloat_equal,
"comparing floating-point with %<==%> "
"or %<!=%> is unsafe");
- if (complain & tf_warning)
- {
- tree stripped_orig_op0 = tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op0);
- tree stripped_orig_op1 = tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op1);
- if ((TREE_CODE (stripped_orig_op0) == STRING_CST
- && !integer_zerop (cp_fully_fold (op1)))
- || (TREE_CODE (stripped_orig_op1) == STRING_CST
- && !integer_zerop (cp_fully_fold (op0))))
- warning_at (location, OPT_Waddress,
- "comparison with string literal results in "
- "unspecified behavior");
- else if (warn_array_compare
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
- do_warn_array_compare (location, code, stripped_orig_op0,
- stripped_orig_op1);
- }
+ {
+ tree stripped_orig_op0 = tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op0);
+ tree stripped_orig_op1 = tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op1);
+ if ((complain & tf_warning_or_error)
+ && ((TREE_CODE (stripped_orig_op0) == STRING_CST
+ && !integer_zerop (cp_fully_fold (op1)))
+ || (TREE_CODE (stripped_orig_op1) == STRING_CST
+ && !integer_zerop (cp_fully_fold (op0)))))
+ warning_at (location, OPT_Waddress,
+ "comparison with string literal results in "
+ "unspecified behavior");
+ else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)) == ARRAY_TYPE)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_warning_or_error)
+ do_warn_array_compare (location, code, stripped_orig_op0,
+ stripped_orig_op1);
+ else if (cxx_dialect >= cxx26)
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
+ }
build_type = boolean_type_node;
if ((code0 == INTEGER_TYPE || code0 == REAL_TYPE
@@ -6125,14 +6129,17 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t &location,
"comparison with string literal results "
"in unspecified behavior");
}
- else if (warn_array_compare
- && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
+ else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op0)) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (orig_op1)) == ARRAY_TYPE
- && code != SPACESHIP_EXPR
- && (complain & tf_warning))
- do_warn_array_compare (location, code,
- tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op0),
- tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op1));
+ && code != SPACESHIP_EXPR)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_warning_or_error)
+ do_warn_array_compare (location, code,
+ tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op0),
+ tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (orig_op1));
+ else if (cxx_dialect >= cxx26)
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
if (gnu_vector_type_p (type0) && gnu_vector_type_p (type1))
{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c
index 922396c0a1a..90191ecd056 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-1.c
@@ -14,12 +14,18 @@ int arr4[2][2];
bool
g ()
{
- bool b = arr1 == arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
- b &= arr1 != arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
- b &= arr1 > arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
- b &= arr1 >= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
- b &= arr1 < arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
- b &= arr1 <= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ bool b = arr1 == arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 != arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 > arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 >= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 < arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 <= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
#ifdef __cplusplus
b &= +arr1 == +arr2;
b &= +arr1 != +arr2;
@@ -35,7 +41,8 @@ g ()
b &= &arr1[0] < &arr2[0];
b &= &arr1[0] <= &arr2[0];
- b &= arr3 == arr4; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr3 == arr4; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
#if defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus > 201703L
auto cmp = arr1 <=> arr2; /* { dg-error "invalid operands" "" { target c++20
} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
index 4725aa2b38b..afcc934010e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ int a[32][32], b[32][32];
int
foo (int x, int y)
{
- return (x ? a : b) == (y ? a : b); /* { dg-warning "comparison between two
arrays" } */
-/* { dg-message "use '&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] ==
&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the addresses" "" { target c } .-1 } */
-/* { dg-message "use unary '\\\+' which decays operands to pointers or
'&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] == &\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the
addresses" "" { target c++ } .-2 } */
+ return (x ? a : b) == (y ? a : b); /* { dg-warning "comparison between two
arrays" "" { target { c || c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+/* { dg-message "use '&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] ==
&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the addresses" "" { target c } .-2 } */
+/* { dg-message "use unary '\\\+' which decays operands to pointers or
'&\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\] == &\\\(\[^\n\r]*\\\)\\\[0\\\]' to compare the
addresses" "" { target c++ } .-3 } */
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8cfb4b2ffe6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/* PR c++/97573 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+# define bool _Bool
+#endif
+
+int arr1[5];
+int arr2[5];
+int arr3[2][2];
+int arr4[2][2];
+
+bool
+g ()
+{
+ bool b = arr1 == arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 != arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 > arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 >= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 < arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+ b &= arr1 <= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+ b &= +arr1 == +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 != +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 > +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 >= +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 < +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 <= +arr2;
+#endif
+ b &= &arr1[0] == &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] != &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] > &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] >= &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] < &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] <= &arr2[0];
+
+ b &= arr3 == arr4; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" "" {
target { c++20 && c++23_down } } } */
+/* { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 } */
+
+#if defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus > 201703L
+ auto cmp = arr1 <=> arr2; /* { dg-error "invalid operands" "" { target c++20
} } */
+#endif
+ return b;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..eab00d63bd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-compare-5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/* PR c++/97573 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wall -Wno-error=array-compare" } */
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+# define bool _Bool
+#endif
+
+int arr1[5];
+int arr2[5];
+int arr3[2][2];
+int arr4[2][2];
+
+bool
+g ()
+{
+ bool b = arr1 == arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr1 != arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr1 > arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr1 >= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr1 < arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+ b &= arr1 <= arr2; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+ b &= +arr1 == +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 != +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 > +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 >= +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 < +arr2;
+ b &= +arr1 <= +arr2;
+#endif
+ b &= &arr1[0] == &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] != &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] > &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] >= &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] < &arr2[0];
+ b &= &arr1[0] <= &arr2[0];
+
+ b &= arr3 == arr4; /* { dg-warning "comparison between two arrays" } */
+
+#if defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus > 201703L
+ auto cmp = arr1 <=> arr2; /* { dg-error "invalid operands" "" { target c++20
} } */
+#endif
+ return b;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..32413292f44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Warray-compare-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// PR c++/117788
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+constexpr int arr1[5]{};
+constexpr int arr2[5]{};
+
+template<int I>
+void f1 (int(*)[arr1 == arr2 ? I : I]) = delete; // { dg-warning "comparison
between two arrays" "" { target { c++20 && c++23_down } } }
+// { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 }
+
+template<int>
+void f1 (...) { }
+
+template<int I>
+void f2 (int(*)[arr1 > arr2 ? I : 1]) = delete; // { dg-warning "comparison
between two arrays" "" { target { c++20 && c++23_down } } }
+// { dg-error "comparison between two arrays" "" { target c++26 } .-1 }
+
+template<int>
+void f2 (...) { }
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+ f1<0>(nullptr);
+ f2<0>(nullptr);
+}
diff --git
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc
index 4a0d1ff001a..4bc0d2da9e0 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/conditionally_borrowed.cc
@@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ void
test02()
{
std::pair<int, std::string_view> a[2]{ {1,"two"}, {3,"four"}};
- auto pos = ranges::find(a | views::values, "four");
+ // FIXME: We should be able to get rid of the decay via the + here.
+ // But we'd end up comparing two array types in equality_comparable_with
+ // -> __weakly_eq_cmp_with which is ill-formed in C++26 due to P2865.
+ auto pos = ranges::find(a | views::values, +"four");
VERIFY( *pos == "four" );
static_assert( ranges::borrowed_range<decltype(a | views::keys)> );
base-commit: d4525729b747827afa62320696709ca499904860
--
2.47.1
