On 21/11/2024 14:24, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > Update test cases to use -mcpu=unset/-march=unset feature introduced in > r15-3606-g7d6c6a0d15c. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > * gcc.dg/pr41574.c: Added option "-mcpu=unset". > * gcc.dg/pr59418.c: Likewise. > * lib/target-supports.exp (add_options_for_vect_early_break): > Likewise. > (add_options_for_arm_v8_neon): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_simd32_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_sat_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_dsp_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_crc_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_neon_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1m_mve_fp_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1a_neon_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_fp16_scalar_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_fp16_neon_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_dotprod_neon_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1m_mve_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_i8mm_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_fp16fml_neon_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_2a_bf16_neon_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8m_main_cde_ok_nocache): Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8m_main_cde_fp_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1m_main_cde_mve_fp_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_3a_complex_neon_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_3a_fp16_complex_neon_ok_nocache): > Likewise. > (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok): Likewise. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr41574.c | 2 +- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59418.c | 2 +- > gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 60 +++++++++++++-------------- > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
This seems to be lacking your usual DCO statement. But perhaps you'd like to consider adding a permanent DCO statement to the MAINTAINERS file, then this wouldn't be needed on individual patches. Otherwise, this is OK. R.
