> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:59 AM Eikansh Gupta > <quic_eikag...@quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > This patch simplify `(trunc)copysign ((extend)x, CST)` to `copysign > > (x, -1.0/1.0)` depending on the sign of CST. Previously, it was simplified > > to > `copysign (x, CST)`. > > It can be optimized as the sign of the CST matters, not the value. > > > > The patch also simplify `(trunc)abs (extend x)` to `abs (x)`. > > Please do not mix two different changes.
The second change is needed because at match.pd:1198, copysign(x, +ve CST) is converted to abs(x). > > > PR tree-optimization/112472 > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * match.pd ((trunc)copysign ((extend)x, -CST) --> copysign (x, > > -1.0)): > New pattern. > > ((trunc)abs (extend x) --> abs (x)): New pattern. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr112472.c: New test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eikansh Gupta <quic_eikag...@quicinc.com> > > --- > > gcc/match.pd | 25 +++++++++++++++++++----- > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr112472.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr112472.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index > > 00988241348..5b930beb418 100644 > > --- a/gcc/match.pd > > +++ b/gcc/match.pd > > @@ -8854,19 +8854,34 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT) > > type, OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOTH)) > > (tos @0)))) > > > > -/* Simplify (trunc)copysign ((extend)x, (extend)y) to copysignf (x, y), > > - x,y is float value, similar for _Float16/double. */ > > +/* Simplify (trunc)copysign ((extend)x, (extend)y) to copysignf (x, y) and > > + simplify (trunc)copysign ((extend)x, CST) to copysign (x, -1.0/1.0). > > + x,y is float value, similar for _Float16/double. */ > > (for copysigns (COPYSIGN_ALL) > > (simplify > > - (convert (copysigns (convert@2 @0) (convert @1))) > > + (convert (copysigns (convert@2 @0) (convert2? @1))) > > You want to capture convert2? with @3 > > > (if (optimize > > && !HONOR_SNANS (@2) > > && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)) > > - && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)) > > && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@2)) > > && direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_COPYSIGN, > > type, OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOTH)) > > - (IFN_COPYSIGN @0 @1)))) > > + (if (TREE_CODE (@1) == REAL_CST) > > and check TREE_CODE (@3) == REAL_CST, we might not always fold a > conversion of a FP constant. A basic question here. When do we not fold this type of conversion? > > + (if (REAL_VALUE_NEGATIVE (TREE_REAL_CST (@1))) > > + (IFN_COPYSIGN @0 { build_minus_one_cst (type); }) > > + (IFN_COPYSIGN @0 { build_one_cst (type); })) Should I remove the above line as copysign(x, +ve CST) is converted to abs(x)? > > + (if (types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1))) > > + (IFN_COPYSIGN @0 @1)))))) > > + > > +/* (trunc)abs (extend x) --> abs (x) > > + x is a float value */ > > +(simplify > > + (convert (abs (convert@1 @0))) > > + (if (optimize > > + && !HONOR_SNANS (@1) > > + && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)) > > + && TYPE_PRECISION (type) < TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@1))) > > + (abs @0))) > > This one is OK, but I don't see a testcase? Please split it out to a > separate patch > and add one. The second testcase is for this change. I will split it into separate patch. > > Richard. Regards, Eikansh