* Jeff Law: > On 11/26/24 9:06 AM, David Malcolm wrote: >> OK for trunk? (caveat: not properly tested) >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> PR translation/90160 >> * config/csky/csky.cc (csky_configure_build_target): Use %qs when >> referring to cpu and arch names. >> (csky_option_override): Likewise.
> It may be a dead port at this point. I'm not sure anyone is doing > anything with csky. We are still building glibc with it. 8-> Last test results have been submitted for glibc 2.34 (three years ago). Last potentially non-generic change was from Alibaba (which matches the GCC maintainers' employer on record). Would it make sense to reach out and ask about port removal at this point? Thanks, Florian
