On 11/25/24 3:09 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
The breakage was caused by the patch for PR109345. As it happens, this
part of the patch was not required to fix the PR and looked to be a
considerable simplification of the condition. Although correct that all
is left are class dummies, it caused the regression by not checking that
it is a class array reference.
Regtested on mainline. OK to apply to all affected branches after
regtesting the backports?
Regards
Paul
Fortran: Partial reversion of patch for pr109345 [PR117763]
2024-11-25 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:pa...@gcc.gnu.org>>
gcc/fortran
PR fortran/117763
* trans-array.cc (gfc_get_array_span): Guard against derefences
of 'expr'. Clean up some typos. Use 'gfc_get_vptr_from_expr'
for clarity and apply a functional reversion of last section
that deals with class dummies.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/117763
* gfortran.dg/pr117763.f90: New test.
OK Paul, thanks for quick fix.
Jerry
