ping
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 9:04 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de; j...@ventanamicro.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: refactor type to be explicit in
> operand_equal_p [PR114932]
>
> ping
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 4:08 PM
> > To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de; j...@ventanamicro.com
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: refactor type to be explicit in
> > operand_equal_p [PR114932]
> >
> > ping
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 8:41 AM
> > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de; j...@ventanamicro.com
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: refactor type to be explicit in
> > > operand_equal_p [PR114932]
> > >
> > > ping
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tamar Christina
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 8:57 PM
> > > > To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de; j...@ventanamicro.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: refactor type to be explicit in
> > > > operand_equal_p [PR114932]
> > > >
> > > > ping
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 2:06 PM
> > > > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > > > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; rguent...@suse.de; j...@ventanamicro.com
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: refactor type to be explicit in
> > > operand_equal_p
> > > > > [PR114932]
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a refactoring with no expected behavioral change.
> > > > > The goal with this is to make the type of the expressions being used
> > > > > explicit.
> > > > >
> > > > > I did not change all the recursive calls to operand_equal_p () to
> > > > > recurse
> > > > > directly to the new function but instead this goes through the top
> > > > > level call
> > > > > which re-extracts the types.
> > > > >
> > > > > This was done because in most of the cases where we recurse type ==
> > > > > arg.
> > > > > The second patch makes use of this new flexibility to implement an
> > > > > overload
> > > > > of operand_equal_p which checks for equality under two's complement.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu,
> > > > > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> > > > > -m32, -m64 and no issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok for master?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Tamar
> > > > >
> > > > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > > >
> > > > > PR tree-optimization/114932
> > > > > * fold-const.cc (operand_compare::operand_equal_p): Split into
> > > > > one that
> > > > > takes explicit type parameters and use that in public one.
> > > > > * fold-const.h (class operand_compare): Add operand_equal_p
> > > > > private
> > > > > overload.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.h b/gcc/fold-const.h
> > > > > index
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> b82ef137e2f2096f86c20df3c7749747e604177e..878545b1148b839e8a8e866f
> > > > > 38e31161f0d116c8 100644
> > > > > --- a/gcc/fold-const.h
> > > > > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.h
> > > > > @@ -273,6 +273,12 @@ protected:
> > > > > true is returned. Then RET is set to corresponding comparsion
> > > > > result. */
> > > > > bool verify_hash_value (const_tree arg0, const_tree arg1, unsigned
> > > > > int
> > flags,
> > > > > bool *ret);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +private:
> > > > > + /* Return true if two operands are equal. The flags fields can be
> > > > > used
> > > > > + to specify OEP flags described in tree-core.h. */
> > > > > + bool operand_equal_p (tree, const_tree, tree, const_tree,
> > > > > + unsigned int flags);
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > #endif // GCC_FOLD_CONST_H
> > > > > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > > > index
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 8908e7381e72cbbf4a8fd96f18cbf4436aba8441..71e82b1d76d4106c7c23c54af
> > > > > 8b35905a1af9f1c 100644
> > > > > --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > > > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > > > @@ -3156,6 +3156,17 @@ combine_comparisons (location_t loc,
> > > > > bool
> > > > > operand_compare::operand_equal_p (const_tree arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > > unsigned int flags)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return operand_equal_p (TREE_TYPE (arg0), arg0, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
> arg1,
> > > > > flags);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* The same as operand_equal_p however the type of ARG0 and ARG1 are
> > > > > assumed to be
> > > > > + the TYPE0 and TYPE1 respectively. */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +bool
> > > > > +operand_compare::operand_equal_p (tree type0, const_tree arg0,
> > > > > + tree type1, const_tree arg1,
> > > > > + unsigned int flags)
> > > > > {
> > > > > bool r;
> > > > > if (verify_hash_value (arg0, arg1, flags, &r))
> > > > > @@ -3166,25 +3177,25 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> > > (const_tree
> > > > > arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > >
> > > > > /* If either is ERROR_MARK, they aren't equal. */
> > > > > if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == ERROR_MARK || TREE_CODE (arg1) ==
> > > ERROR_MARK
> > > > > - || TREE_TYPE (arg0) == error_mark_node
> > > > > - || TREE_TYPE (arg1) == error_mark_node)
> > > > > + || type0 == error_mark_node
> > > > > + || type1 == error_mark_node)
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Similar, if either does not have a type (like a template id),
> > > > > they aren't equal. */
> > > > > - if (!TREE_TYPE (arg0) || !TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> > > > > + if (!type0 || !type1)
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Bitwise identity makes no sense if the values have different
> > > > > layouts. */
> > > > > if ((flags & OEP_BITWISE)
> > > > > - && !tree_nop_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (arg0), TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + && !tree_nop_conversion_p (type0, type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* We cannot consider pointers to different address space equal.
> > > > > */
> > > > > - if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> > > > > - && (TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
> > > > > - != TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))))
> > > > > + if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type0)
> > > > > + && POINTER_TYPE_P (type1)
> > > > > + && (TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (type0))
> > > > > + != TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (type1))))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Check equality of integer constants before bailing out due to
> > > > > @@ -3211,12 +3222,15 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> > > (const_tree
> > > > > arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > >
> > > > > /* If both types don't have the same precision, then it is not
> > > > > safe
> > > > > to strip NOPs. */
> > > > > - if (element_precision (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - != element_precision (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (element_precision (type0)
> > > > > + != element_precision (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > STRIP_NOPS (arg0);
> > > > > STRIP_NOPS (arg1);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + type0 = TREE_TYPE (arg0);
> > > > > + type1 = TREE_TYPE (arg1);
> > > > > }
> > > > > #if 0
> > > > > /* FIXME: Fortran FE currently produce ADDR_EXPR of NOP_EXPR.
> > > > > Enable
> > the
> > > > > @@ -3275,9 +3289,9 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> (const_tree
> > > > arg0,
> > > > > const_tree arg1,
> > > > >
> > > > > /* When not checking adddresses, this is needed for conversions
> > > > > and for
> > > > > COMPONENT_REF. Might as well play it safe and always test
> > > > > this. */
> > > > > - if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)) == ERROR_MARK
> > > > > - || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (arg1)) == ERROR_MARK
> > > > > - || (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)) != TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE
> > > > > (arg1))
> > > > > + if (TREE_CODE (type0) == ERROR_MARK
> > > > > + || TREE_CODE (type1) == ERROR_MARK
> > > > > + || (TYPE_MODE (type0) != TYPE_MODE (type1)
> > > > > && !(flags & OEP_ADDRESS_OF)))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -3364,8 +3378,8 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> (const_tree
> > > > arg0,
> > > > > const_tree arg1,
> > > > > return true;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* See sem_variable::equals in ipa-icf for a similar
> > > > > approach. */
> > > > > - tree typ0 = TREE_TYPE (arg0);
> > > > > - tree typ1 = TREE_TYPE (arg1);
> > > > > + tree typ0 = type0;
> > > > > + tree typ1 = type1;
> > > > >
> > > > > if (TREE_CODE (typ0) != TREE_CODE (typ1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > @@ -3444,8 +3458,8 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> (const_tree
> > > > arg0,
> > > > > const_tree arg1,
> > > > > {
> > > > > CASE_CONVERT:
> > > > > case FIX_TRUNC_EXPR:
> > > > > - if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - != TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type0)
> > > > > + != TYPE_UNSIGNED (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > break;
> > > > > default:
> > > > > @@ -3481,12 +3495,12 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> > > (const_tree
> > > > > arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > > case INDIRECT_REF:
> > > > > if (!(flags & OEP_ADDRESS_OF))
> > > > > {
> > > > > - if (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - != TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (TYPE_ALIGN (type0)
> > > > > + != TYPE_ALIGN (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > /* Verify that the access types are compatible. */
> > > > > - if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type0)
> > > > > + != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > }
> > > > > flags &= ~OEP_ADDRESS_OF;
> > > > > @@ -3494,8 +3508,8 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> (const_tree
> > > > arg0,
> > > > > const_tree arg1,
> > > > >
> > > > > case IMAGPART_EXPR:
> > > > > /* Require the same offset. */
> > > > > - if (!operand_equal_p (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)),
> > > > > - TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg1)),
> > > > > + if (!operand_equal_p (TYPE_SIZE (type0),
> > > > > + TYPE_SIZE (type1),
> > > > > flags & ~OEP_ADDRESS_OF))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -3509,15 +3523,15 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> > > (const_tree
> > > > > arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > > if (!(flags & OEP_ADDRESS_OF))
> > > > > {
> > > > > /* Require equal access sizes */
> > > > > - if (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)) != TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE
> > > > > (arg1))
> > > > > - && (!TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - || !TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> > > > > - || !operand_equal_p (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg0)),
> > > > > - TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (arg1)),
> > > > > + if (TYPE_SIZE (type0) != TYPE_SIZE (type1)
> > > > > + && (!TYPE_SIZE (type0)
> > > > > + || !TYPE_SIZE (type1)
> > > > > + || !operand_equal_p (TYPE_SIZE (type0),
> > > > > + TYPE_SIZE (type1),
> > > > > flags)))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > /* Verify that access happens in similar types. */
> > > > > - if (!types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE (arg0), TREE_TYPE
> > > > > (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (!types_compatible_p (type0, type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > /* Verify that accesses are TBAA compatible. */
> > > > > if (!alias_ptr_types_compatible_p
> > > > > @@ -3529,8 +3543,8 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> (const_tree
> > > > arg0,
> > > > > const_tree arg1,
> > > > > != MR_DEPENDENCE_BASE (arg1)))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > /* Verify that alignment is compatible. */
> > > > > - if (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - != TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (TYPE_ALIGN (type0)
> > > > > + != TYPE_ALIGN (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > > }
> > > > > flags &= ~OEP_ADDRESS_OF;
> > > > > @@ -3802,16 +3816,16 @@ operand_compare::operand_equal_p
> > > (const_tree
> > > > > arg0, const_tree arg1,
> > > > > indexed in increasing order and form an initial sequence.
> > > > >
> > > > > We make no effort to compare nonconstant ones in GENERIC.
> > > > > */
> > > > > - if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
> > > > > - || !VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg1)))
> > > > > + if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (type0)
> > > > > + || !VECTOR_TYPE_P (type1))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Be sure that vectors constructed have the same
> > > > > representation.
> > > > > We only tested element precision and modes to match.
> > > > > Vectors may be BLKmode and thus also check that the number
> > > > > of
> > > > > parts match. */
> > > > > - if (maybe_ne (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (arg0)),
> > > > > - TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (arg1))))
> > > > > + if (maybe_ne (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type0),
> > > > > + TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type1)))
> > > > > return false;
> > > > >
> > > > > vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *v0 = CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (arg0);
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
