On Thu, 21 Nov 2024, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > Based on that -- should the same reasoning apply to the new builtins? > I.e. do you believe it would be reasonable to say that the new builtins > require libatomic, and remove this flag entirely?
I think it's reasonable to say that atomic built-in functions (beyond maybe the limited case of existing __sync_* in cases where they worked before the addition of libatomic) can require libatomic. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
