On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:04:11AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This test FAILs due to the second dg-do compile:
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr58483.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> and it passes in C++11 as well.
The other tests are valid C++11, so we can run them in C++11 as well
(just they didn't have the second dg-do compile that would break them
at C++98).
Tested on x86_64-linux with
GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26 make check-g++
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp='pr96945.C pr110819.C pr116868.C pr58483.C'"
and committed to trunk as obvious.
2024-11-15 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr116868.C: Change effective target from c++14 to
c++11.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr96945.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr110819.C: Likewise.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr116868.C.jj 2024-11-14 22:44:45.504490005
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr116868.C 2024-11-15 08:36:05.572401023
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" }
#include <vector>
int sumVector() {
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr96945.C.jj 2024-11-14 22:44:45.504490005
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr96945.C 2024-11-15 08:35:25.971956988
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" }
#include <vector>
struct c {
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr110819.C.jj 2024-11-14 22:44:45.504490005
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr110819.C 2024-11-15 08:37:53.032892354
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" }
#include<vector>
Jakub
