Bug 117164 is an ICE on an existing test with -std=gnu23 involving a
nested function returning a variable-size structure (and I think the
last bug needing to be resolved before switching to -std=gnu23 as the
default, as without fixing this would be a clear regression from a
change in default).
The problem is a GIMPLE verification failure where (after type
remapping from inlining / cloning) the return type of the function no
longer exactly matches the type to which it is assigned (these types
use structural equality, which means GIMPLE verification can't use
TYPE_CANONICAL and expects an exact match). Specifically, the nested
function itself is *not* inlined (the -fno-inline-small-functions in
the original test nested-func-12.c, I think, or the noinline attribute
in some of my variant tests), but the function containing it is either
cloned (the --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0 in the original test) or
inlined. (I'm not sure what role -fno-guess-branch-probability plays
in getting the right situation for the ICE; maybe affecting when
inlining or cloning is considered profitable?)
There is in fact existing code in tree-nested.cc to prevent inlining
of a function containing a nested function with variably modified
*argument* types. I think the same issue of ensuring consistency of
types means such prevention should also apply for a variably modified
return type. Furthermore, exactly the same problem applies for
cloning for other reasons as it does for inlining. Thus, change the
logic to include variably modified return types for nested functions
alongside those for arguments of those functions as a reason not to
inline, and also add the noclone attribute in these cases.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86-64-pc-linux-gnu.
PR c/117164
gcc/
* tree-nested.cc: Include "attribs.h".
(check_for_nested_with_variably_modified): Also return true for
variably modified return type.
(create_nesting_tree): If check_for_nested_with_variably_modified
returns true, also add noclone attribute.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/nested-func-13.c, gcc.dg/nested-func-14.c:
gcc.dg/nested-func-15.c, gcc.dg/nested-func-16.c,
gcc.dg/nested-func-17.c: New tests.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-13.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-13.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..697a62354109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-13.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* Test nested-func-12.c with -std=gnu17. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0
-fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-inline-small-functions -std=gnu17" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
+
+#include "nested-func-12.c"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-14.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-14.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..05a77bdb1a5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-14.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* Test nested-func-12.c with -std=gnu23. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0
-fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-inline-small-functions -std=gnu23" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
+
+#include "nested-func-12.c"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-15.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-15.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..490d69599868
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-15.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* Bug 117164: ICE with -std=gnu23 inlining function containing call
+ to non-inlined nested function returning variable-size struct. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0
-fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-inline-small-functions -std=gnu23" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
+
+void
+foo (int n)
+{
+ struct S { int a[n]; };
+
+ struct S
+ fn (void)
+ {
+ struct S s;
+ s.a[0] = 42;
+ return s;
+ }
+
+ fn ();
+ fn ();
+ fn ();
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ foo (1);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-16.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-16.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..061485727bba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-16.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* Bug 117164: ICE with -std=gnu23 inlining function containing call
+ to non-inlined nested function returning variable-size struct. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fno-guess-branch-probability -std=gnu23" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
+
+void
+foo (int n)
+{
+ struct S { int a[n]; };
+
+ __attribute__ ((noinline)) struct S
+ fn (void)
+ {
+ struct S s;
+ s.a[0] = 42;
+ return s;
+ }
+
+ fn ();
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ foo (1);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-17.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-17.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3441d79ac0dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nested-func-17.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* Bug 117164: ICE with -std=gnu23 inlining function containing call
+ to non-inlined nested function returning variable-size struct. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0
-fno-guess-branch-probability -std=gnu23" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target alloca } */
+
+#include "nested-func-16.c"
diff --git a/gcc/tree-nested.cc b/gcc/tree-nested.cc
index a54e72c32370..4f5763634d3f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-nested.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-nested.cc
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include "tree-nested.h"
#include "symbol-summary.h"
#include "symtab-thunks.h"
+#include "attribs.h"
/* Summary of nested functions. */
static function_summary <nested_function_info *>
@@ -908,7 +909,11 @@ walk_all_functions (walk_stmt_fn callback_stmt,
walk_tree_fn callback_op,
add a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to each such operand for each call to the nested
function. The former is not practical. The latter would still require
detecting this case to know when to add the conversions. So, for now at
- least, we don't inline such an enclosing function.
+ least, we don't inline such an enclosing function. A similar issue
+ applies if the nested function has a variably modified return type, and
+ is not inlined, but the enclosing function is inlined and so the type of
+ the return slot as used in the enclosing function is remapped, so also
+ avoid inlining in that case.
We have to do that check recursively, so here return indicating whether
FNDECL has such a nested function. ORIG_FN is the function we were
@@ -929,6 +934,9 @@ check_for_nested_with_variably_modified (tree fndecl, tree
orig_fndecl)
for (cgn = first_nested_function (cgn); cgn;
cgn = next_nested_function (cgn))
{
+ if (variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (cgn->decl)),
+ orig_fndecl))
+ return true;
for (arg = DECL_ARGUMENTS (cgn->decl); arg; arg = DECL_CHAIN (arg))
if (variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (arg), orig_fndecl))
return true;
@@ -967,7 +975,13 @@ create_nesting_tree (struct cgraph_node *cgn)
/* See discussion at check_for_nested_with_variably_modified for a
discussion of why this has to be here. */
if (check_for_nested_with_variably_modified (info->context, info->context))
- DECL_UNINLINABLE (info->context) = true;
+ {
+ DECL_UNINLINABLE (info->context) = true;
+ tree attrs = DECL_ATTRIBUTES (info->context);
+ if (lookup_attribute ("noclone", attrs) == NULL)
+ DECL_ATTRIBUTES (info->context)
+ = tree_cons (get_identifier ("noclone"), NULL, attrs);
+ }
return info;
}
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmy...@redhat.com
