On 11/14/24 11:42 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
The section name might the user a hint of what is going on.
I tried to include the flags as well, but there didn't seem to be
consensus about including the internal section flags in the diagnostics:
[RFC PATCH] More detailed diagnostics for section type conflicts
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/87y13awl2k....@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/>
gcc/
* varasm.cc (get_section): Include name of section in
diagnostic messages.
OK. Going to assume you've done or will do the usual bootstrap and
regression check. While I don't expect problems, I wouldn't be terribly
surprised to find some diagnostic test to be overly sensitive to the
exact diagnostic message.
jeff
