Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the update.  As usual, I can only comment on the GCC internals,
> without much knowledge of how mingw actually behaves.  On that basis,
> I've replied to two of the patches individually, but the series otherwise
> looks good to me.  OK for trunk with those changes if there are no objections
> by noon UTC on Thursday.

Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:

> No further objections from me on this version of the patchset, thanks for
> the update!

Thank you for the review and the valuable contribution to the patch series 
quality.

The formatting will be adjusted in the patch
[PATCH v3 5/8] aarch64: Multiple adjustments to support the SMALL code model 
correctly

The proposed change for 
"[PATCH v3 6/8] aarch64: Extend the offset limit in "symbol + offset" from 1MB 
to 16MB"
has been successfully validated and will be used for the final merging.
The patch series will be merged next week.

> I can't remember if I've asked this before, but would you like commit
> access?  If so, please follow the process on https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html
> listing me as sponsor.

Thank you, I already have an account with commit access.

Regards,
Evgeny

Reply via email to