On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 12:35 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:35:34PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote: > > The patch set aims to update libsanitizer from upstream. The motivation is > > that > > RISC-V is changing the shadow offset for AddressSanitizer, and I also plan > > to > > submit another patch set to add dynamic shadow offset support for GCC. > > > > This is my first time updating it, so I used my laptop and an AArch64 server > > from cfram to run the regression tests. I tested on x86_64/Linux (Ubuntu > > 22.04) > > and AArch64/Linux (Rocky 9.4), both with --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan > > and > > performed a standard 3-stage build. No new regressions were introduced. > > > > NOTE: I tried to run regression tests with > > --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan, but I received warnings from > > LeakSanitizer due to the pretty printer, which make the test results > > unusable... > > If pretty-printer now massively leaks, we should file a PR and get it fixed > for GCC 15. > > > Kito Cheng (4): > > libsanitizer: merge from upstream (61a6439f35b6de28) > > libsanitizer: Apply local patches > > libsanitizer: Improve FrameIsInternal > > libsanitizer: update test > > Ok for trunk, but please mention in LOCAL_PATCHES all the 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4 > commits, not just 2/4 (and commit that as the last patch, separately > from the series so that you don't need to repeat it any time git rebase > is needed before pushing).
IIUC 4/4 shouldn't be in LOCAL_PATCHES? It modifies our own test case, not from the upstream. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
