The BPF-specific .BTF.ext section is always generated for BPF programs if -gbtf is specified, and generating it requires BTF information and assumes that the BTF info has already been generated.
Compiling non-C languages to BPF is not supported, nor is generating CTF/BTF for non-C. But, compiling another language like C++ to BPF with -gbtf specified meant that we would try to generate the .BTF.ext section anyway, and then ICE because no BTF information was available. Add a check to bail out of btf_ext_output if the TU CTFC does not exist, meaning no BTF info is available. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu host for bpf-unknown-none. gcc/ PR target/117447 * config/bpf/btfext-out.cc (btf_ext_output): Bail if TU CTFC is null. --- gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc b/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc index ca6241aa52e..760b2b59ff6 100644 --- a/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc +++ b/gcc/config/bpf/btfext-out.cc @@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ btf_ext_init (void) void btf_ext_output (void) { + if (!ctf_get_tu_ctfc ()) + return; + output_btfext_header (); output_btfext_func_info (btf_ext); if (TARGET_BPF_CORE) -- 2.45.2