> I think it'd be better if I abstain from this. I probably disagree too > much with the current structure and the way that the code is developing. > I won't object if anyone else approves it though.
It's not that I'm happy with the current state either and I thought about how to rewrite it more than once. So if you have an idea for a good rework of it (or larger parts of ifcvt) I'd be all ears. My argument right now would be that this patch doesn't make things worse in terms of complexity and improves SPEC 2017's deepsjeng considerably on riscv. IMHO it doesn't inhibit a future rewrite and even simplifies things ever so slightly. -- Regards Robin
