On 2024-11-05 13:54, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 05/11/2024 07:49, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-14?

--

The test case assumes that -mfp16-format=alternative is accepted for the
target, but not all targets support this flag. One such target is
Cortex-M85 that does support FP16, but not the alternative format.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c: Use effective-target
        arm_fp16_alternative.

Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>
---
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c
index 559f9a26c1e..76bf7ac6589 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr98636.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  /* { dg-do compile } */
  /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfp_ok } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_fp16_alternative_ok } */
  /* { dg-options "-mfp16-format=alternative -mfloat-abi=softfp" } */

I think you also need dg-add-options arm_fp16_alternative, since the OK test 
checks various option combinations to see if they work.  So
/* { dg-options "-mfloat-abi=softfp" } */
/* { dg-add-options arm_fp16_alternative } */

OK with that change (assuming it works).
It works, so pushed as r15-4965-g4602f628f72 and r14.2.0-362-g232d539f25b.

Kind regards,
Torbjörn

Reply via email to