On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 11:41 +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi David
> 
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 07:36 +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > > Or you do the same as forhttps://gcc.gnu.org/PR115203 ; namely,
> > > your commit
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-866-g2dbb1c124c1e585dc413132d7a8d4be62c6b7baa
> > > added: […]
> > > +    disable_event_localization ();
> > Doing so for this case would require implementing a new feature in
> > the
> > diagnostic_context to suppress message translation, so I went for
> > the
> > simpler option (bigger hammer?) of using LC_ALL=C.
> 
> As this should also fix PR115203, shouldn't r15-866-g2dbb1c124 then
> be 
> reverted to have only one means (LC_ALL) to fix this instead of two 
> (disable_event_localization — only covering part of the code — and
> LC_ALL)?

I don't think so.  Ultimately we might to have a more fine-grained way
to disable localization, so I want to keep r15-866-g2dbb1c124, but for
now I wanted to unbreak the bootstrap, so I applied the "big hammer"
version of the patch.

Dave

Reply via email to