Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> writes:
> Andrew pointed this out when committing those testsuite fixes earlier. We
> may as well make these proper torture tests rather than having them
> unnecessarily in the special lto/ dir which is meant for multiple files
> really.
>
> Sam James (3):
> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr62026 test to torture
> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr95677 test to torture
> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr47333 test to torture
>
Do these look OK? I've dropped the pr62026 change locally because -r
doesn't play well with torture.
I think it's borderline obvious but it's somewhat opinionated so I'd
like someone to ack it. Thanks.
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr47333_0.C => torture/pr47333.C} | 3 +--
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr62026_0.C => torture/pr62026.C} | 4 ++--
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr95677_0.C => torture/pr95677.C} | 6 +-----
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr47333_0.C => torture/pr47333.C} (99%)
> rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr62026_0.C => torture/pr62026.C} (75%)
> rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr95677_0.C => torture/pr95677.C} (71%)
