On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:12 AM Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:56 AM Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> > After r13-707-g68e0063397ba82, COND_EXPR for gimple assign no longer could 
> > contain a comparison.
> > The vectorizer was builting gimple assigns with comparison until 
> > r15-4695-gd17e672ce82e69
> > (which added an assert to make sure it no longer builds it).
> >
> > So let's remove the special handling COND_EXPR in a few places and add an 
> > assert to
> > gimple_build_assign_1 to make sure we don't build a gimple assign any more 
> > with a comparison.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
> OK.
>
> The biggest offender still present is phiopt building a GENERIC
> comparison for the
> piecewise COND_EXPR simplification in gimple_simplify_phiopt (so
> genmatch needs to
> create both GIMPLE and GENERIC match variants for COND_EXPR conditions).
> maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd uses on-stack temporary GIMPLE for
> a similar (more complex) case.

Let me look into doing that; though I might not get to it until next
year for GCC 16. I filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117385 to make sure I
don't lose track of implementing it.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

>
> Richard.
>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         PR middle-end/114785
> >         PR middle-end/116949
> >         * gimple-match-exports.cc (maybe_push_res_to_seq): Remove special
> >         handling of COMPARISON_CLASS_P in COND_EXPR/VEC_COND_EXPR.
> >         (gimple_extract): Likewise.
> >         * gimple-walk.cc (walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops): Likewise.
> >         * gimple.cc (gimple_build_assign_1):
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
> > ---
> >  gcc/gimple-match-exports.cc | 12 +-----------
> >  gcc/gimple-walk.cc          | 11 -----------
> >  gcc/gimple.cc               |  3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-match-exports.cc b/gcc/gimple-match-exports.cc
> > index 77d225825cf..bc8038c19f0 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-match-exports.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-match-exports.cc
> > @@ -489,12 +489,6 @@ maybe_push_res_to_seq (gimple_match_op *res_op, 
> > gimple_seq *seq, tree res)
> >         && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[i]))
> >        return NULL_TREE;
> >
> > -  if (num_ops > 0 && COMPARISON_CLASS_P (ops[0]))
> > -    for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
> > -      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], i)) == SSA_NAME
> > -         && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], i)))
> > -       return NULL_TREE;
> > -
> >    if (res_op->code.is_tree_code ())
> >      {
> >        auto code = tree_code (res_op->code);
> > @@ -786,11 +780,7 @@ gimple_extract (gimple *stmt, gimple_match_op *res_op,
> >             }
> >           case GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS:
> >             {
> > -             tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
> > -             if (code == COND_EXPR && COMPARISON_CLASS_P (rhs1))
> > -               rhs1 = valueize_condition (rhs1);
> > -             else
> > -               rhs1 = valueize_op (rhs1);
> > +             tree rhs1 = valueize_op (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt));
> >               tree rhs2 = valueize_op (gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt));
> >               tree rhs3 = valueize_op (gimple_assign_rhs3 (stmt));
> >               res_op->set_op (code, type, rhs1, rhs2, rhs3);
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-walk.cc b/gcc/gimple-walk.cc
> > index 9f768ca20fd..00520319aa9 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-walk.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-walk.cc
> > @@ -835,17 +835,6 @@ walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops (gimple *stmt, void 
> > *data,
> >             ;
> >           else if (TREE_CODE (op) == ADDR_EXPR)
> >             ret |= visit_addr (stmt, TREE_OPERAND (op, 0), op, data);
> > -         /* COND_EXPR and VCOND_EXPR rhs1 argument is a comparison
> > -            tree with two operands.  */
> > -         else if (i == 1 && COMPARISON_CLASS_P (op))
> > -           {
> > -             if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (op, 0)) == ADDR_EXPR)
> > -               ret |= visit_addr (stmt, TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (op, 0),
> > -                                                      0), op, data);
> > -             if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (op, 1)) == ADDR_EXPR)
> > -               ret |= visit_addr (stmt, TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (op, 1),
> > -                                                      0), op, data);
> > -           }
> >         }
> >      }
> >    else if (gcall *call_stmt = dyn_cast <gcall *> (stmt))
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple.cc b/gcc/gimple.cc
> > index eeb1badff5f..f7b313be40e 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple.cc
> > @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ gimple_build_assign_1 (tree lhs, enum tree_code 
> > subcode, tree op1,
> >          gimple_build_with_ops_stat (GIMPLE_ASSIGN, (unsigned)subcode, 
> > num_ops
> >                                     PASS_MEM_STAT));
> >    gimple_assign_set_lhs (p, lhs);
> > +  /* For COND_EXPR, op1 should not be a comparison. */
> > +  if (op1 && subcode == COND_EXPR)
> > +    gcc_assert (!COMPARISON_CLASS_P  (op1));
> >    gimple_assign_set_rhs1 (p, op1);
> >    if (op2)
> >      {
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >

Reply via email to