>> >> Would it be possible to drop it altogether and use s-osprim__posix.adb >> instead? >> Otherwise what's the remaining difference between >> s-osprim__posix.adb and s-osprim__rtems.adb? The difference should >> help us find a proper name based on properties of the file. > > At first view, it seems possible and desirable to merge _posix and > _rtems, but working on this right now would be counter-productive. > > I suggest to apply patches 1-2 and fix PR114065 first. > > Then the cosmetic changes in patches 3-6 (and possibly a trivial > backport of 8). > > After that, we will have all the time in the long winter afternoons to > discuss file names in patch 7.
Hello Nicolas, I wanted to test your latest version of the patch, but it does not apply cleanly. Any chance you could send an updated version? I've tried to apply over some recent revisions and also over some revisions around the time you sent your mail, but none worked. Thanks, Marc
